¹«Á¦ ¹®¼­
  Home ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ ·Î±×ÀÎ ±¸µ¶½Åû
 
Untitled Document
Headline News
Focus
National News I
  National News II
  International News I
  International News II
  People
  In Spotlight
  Unique_Story
  Science / Tech
  Your Body
  Opinion
  Culture/Trend
World Report
  Special Report
  Periscope
  Debate/Hot Issues
  Sports
  Entertainment
  Knowledge

Strange?
Current Events
  Odd NewsI
  Odd NewsII
  Teen Scoop
  Star Interview
  Inside The World
  Did You Know?
 
 
Untitled Document
  Then What Is Invasion?   (21-05-2013)

If the armed forces of a country forcibly or aggressively enter territory controlled by another country, it is ¡°invasion,¡± pure and simple. But a Japanese politician seems to think quite differently. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe recently stirred up outrage of the peoples in the countries his nation invaded in the early 1900s, when he said, ¡°There are no international or academic definitions of invasion.¡±

Abe went so far as to deny Japan ever invaded its Asian neighbors. He told Japanese parliamentarians on April 23 that he wonders if Japan¡¯s occupation of other Asian countries during World War Two can be considered ¡°invasion.¡± As for the definition of the word ¡°invasion,¡± he added, ¡°It depends on the point of view of individual countries.¡±

The day when Abe denied Japan¡¯s invasion of its neighbors in the past, 168 Japanese parliamentarians visited the Yasukuni Shrine, a controversial war shrine in Tokyo, where 14 leading war criminals are enshrined alongside 2.5 million other people. Three Cabinet members did the same the previous day. And Abe defended them and dismissed criticism, saying, ¡°Our ministers will never cave in to any threats.¡±

However, Abe relented a little on May 8 by saying, ¡°Japan brought about great damage and suffering to Asians.¡± But when he said this, he still omitted mentioning the word ¡°invasion.¡± His latest comment was believed to be a move to calm down the outraged sentiments in South Korea and China to some extent.

By all appearances, Abe has crossed the diplomatic ¡°red line.¡± His remarks clash with the universal view of history. Is he nostalgic about the status the imperial Japan once held in the past? Japan¡¯s war crimes were no less atrocious than the Nazi¡¯s. Nonetheless, he attempted to deny his country invaded its neighbors and committed many unforgivable barbarities. Then what is invasion?

No glib sophistry can remove his country¡¯s war crime stains. Does he believe he can blot out the sun with his hands? Many victims of Japan¡¯s atrocities are still alive and bear testimony to what the imperial Japanese soldiers did to them and their countries. We just hope that the Japanese will regain their reason and learn to view history as it happened. Why can¡¯t they learn from what the Germans did after World War Two? It has been almost seven long decades since the war came to an end. But the Japanese are still denying what their country did¡¦
.